Everytext Logo
HomeLibraryCommunity-Making in Early Stuart Theatres: Stage and Audience
Community-Making in Early Stuart Theatres: Stage and Audience
ISBN-13: 9780367140502
Trade Paperback
432 Pages

Community-Making in Early Stuart Theatres: Stage and Audience

by Johnson, Anthony W., Sell, Roger D., Wilcox, Helen

Rent This Book

Returns in 60 days

$39.75/ 60 days

Please Note: Rental books are typically used and do not come with any unused access code cards.

Free returns on all rentals

Product Details

ISBN-139780367140502
ISBN-100367140500
PublisherRoutledge
Published01-2019
Edition1st
LanguageEnglish
FormatTrade Paperback
Pages432

About This Book

Twenty-two leading experts on early modern drama collaborate in this volume

to explore three closely interconnected research questions. To what extent did

playwrights represent dramatis personae in their entertainments as forming, or

failing to form, communal groupings? How far were theatrical productions likely

to weld, or separate, different communal groupings within their target audiences?

And how might such bondings or oppositions among spectators have tallied with

the community-making or -breaking on stage? Chapters in Part One respond to

one or more of these questions by reassessing general period trends in censorship,

theatre attendance, forms of patronage, playwrights' professional and linguistic

networks, their use of music, and their handling of ethical controversies.

In Part Two, responses arise from detailed re-examinations of particular plays

by Shakespeare, Chapman, Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher, Cary, Webster, Middleton,

Massinger, Ford, and Shirley. Both Parts cover a full range of early-Stuart

theatre settings, from the public and popular to the more private circumstances

of hall playhouses, court masques, women's drama, country-house theatricals,

and school plays. And one overall finding is that, although playwrights frequently

staged or alluded to communal conflict, they seldom exacerbated such divisiveness

within their audience. Rather, they tended toward more tactful modes of

address (sometimes even acknowledging their own ideological uncertainties) so

that, at least for the duration of a play, their audiences could be a community

within which internal rifts were openly brought into dialogue.